In a conversation with my mother about the world, falsehood of other religions, and the way things should be, somehow I got the idea to describe two worlds in which mankind can live and function. By our nature, as seen in the bible and by common sense and logic, we live in one of them, and the other, is a vision of a perfect world which can be completely toppled and broken by one selfish person.
I think it started out as me enumerating all the different facts I had recently learned about Mormonism and discussing how I couldn’t see the way it made any sense to anybody apart from completely blind faith; no hard facts, no physical/historical evidence, false historical accounts, etc. -Another post for another time, but that’s how it started.
Eventually, we moved into Christianity and it’s accounts of history, and then somehow into human nature, which I tied back into the kind of people Christians are becoming ultimately; though my thought process, which I will try to lay out, follows an extreme idea/thought-flow that is more meant to illustrate a point rather than lay out God’s plan of redemption. So there’s my disclaimer, and now comes the idea:
There are two possible ways of mankind living on this earth: either with every man for himself, or every man for the other man; any mixture of the two results in destruction.
Two Worlds
“The world in which we, as a species, physically survive must necessarily rely on one thing: mans’ service to mans’ self. Where ever you find a man serving another man before the self, there you will find a deity, for no other nature than a deity can afford such reckless abandon of needs.”
Leave a comment